AAMI
25th January '96

Jesus in Ahmadiyyat

Part IVa

Jesus' Character Belittled by Mirza

"(Jesus) had the habit of uttering obscenities and
frequently using foul language." (Zamima Anjam-e-Atham, Roohani Khazain , Vol 11 p. 289 )

"It should be remembered that he (Jesus) had
also to some extent the habit of lying."
(Zamima Anjam Atham, Roohani Khazain Vol 11 p. 289)

"A cunning and wicked (peson) who had
the soul of the Messiah from head to toe."
(Zamimah Anjam Atham, Roohani Khazain Vol 11 p. 289 )

In the following remarks, Mirza slandered those who believed in Jesus by deviously thrusting the blame of his obscene insults on Christians:

"What is your opinion about the character of the Messiah? (it is that Jesus ) was an Alcoholic and Gluttonous person, neither Abstinent nor a Pious Worshipper, nor a Truth seeker. He was a Proud and a Self- conceited Claimant of Divinity."

(Nur-ul-Quran, Roohani Khazain Vol 9 p.387)

"The root cause of all the damage that alcohol consumption has had on the Europeans was that Jesus used to drink alcohol, perhaps becuase of some disease or an old habit."

(Kashti-e-Nooh, Roohani Khazain vol 19 p.71)

Mirza would often engage in self-admiration. For example, while expressing his own reliance on God for the cure of his ailments, he did not waste this oppurtunity to criticize Jesus. The following remark of Mirza is a testamony of his evil objectives:

"Once a friend advised me that opium is good for diabetes so there is no harm in taking opium for the purpose of treatment. I replied , thank you very much for your sympathetic advice. But if I get into the habit taking opium I am afraid the people will mock that the first Messiah (Jesus) was an alcoholic and the second a drug addict."

(Kashti-e-Nooh, Roohani Khazain vol 19 p.434)

It is well known that the messengers of God have often been accused, defamed and rejected. Mirza never missed an opportunity of capitalizing on such vile accusations to prove that Jesus was worthless. He singled out Jesus for mudslinging because Mirza viewed Jesus as the one competing with him for Messiahship. One can witness his irrational and desperate attempts to improve his own public image by digging out slanderous remarks about Jesus. Mirza would then dwell on these remarks to eventually draw the most negative conclusions. The following demonstrates how Mirza literally seconded the false accusation about Jesus.

"(while on the cross) Jesus could not protray himself as pious man because people knew he was gluttonous alcoholic and these bad habits were not ever since claiming divinity but it seems from early age he had (these habits). Therefore to claim divinity is one of the bad after effects of alcoholism."

(Satt bachan, Roohani Khazain vol 10 p 296)

In the next accusations Mirza's filthy and vile imagination had really run amock. These atrocious and blasphemous remarks clearly demonstrate Mirza's shameful distortion of the Biblical episodes as a way to deride our beloved Jesus:

"Jesus had an inclination for prostitutes, perhaps due to his ancestral relationship with them, otherwise no pious man could allow a young prostitute to touch his head with her filthy hands, and massage his head with the unclean perfume purchased with the earnings of adultery and rub his feet with her hair. Let the intelligent judge what sort of character such a person must possess."

(Zamimah Anjam Atham, Roohani Khazain Vol 11 p.291)

"A beautiful prostitute is sitting so close to him as though she is embracing him. Sometimes she massages his head with perfume or holds his feet, and sometimes she lays her beautiful black hair on his feet and plays in his lap. In this situation Mr. Messiah is sitting in ecstacy. If someone rises to object he is scolded. Besides his young age, the habit of alcoholism and being a bachelor, a beautiful prostitute is lying in front of him touching her body with his. Is this the behaviour of a virtuous person? And what evidence or proof is there that Jesus did not get sexually aroused by the touch of the prostitute? Alas! Jesus could not even have the facility of sexual intercourse with a wife of his own after passing his glance upon that adultress. What sexual excitement would have been provoked by the touching of that wretched adultress and her playfulness! The sexual excitement and arousal would have done its work to the extreme. This is the reason why Jesus could not even open his mouth to say, 'Oh adultress! Keep away from me'. It is well established in the Bible that that woman was one of the prostitutes, notorious for adultery in the entire city".

(Nur-ul-Quran, Roohani Khazain vol 9 p.449)

Thus Mirza has exposed his true nature. These disgusting statements are not the true account of what is written in Bible. The actual episode in the New Testamant can be found on Luke 7:36-50, John 12:3-8 and Matthew 26:6-13. Reader will discover that Bible in no way portray the picture which Mirza Ghulam's wicked and sick imagintion had painted.

Go to Part IVb - Jesus' Teachings Disparaged

Back to Home Page