AAMI
26th January '96

Jesus in Ahmadiyyat

Part IV (b)

Jesus' Teachings Disparaged

Following are the views of Mirza Ghulam about the teachings of Hazrat Eisa (Jesus Christ) AS:

"(Jesus, The Messiah ) came to a particular nation and Alas! the world did not get any spiritual benefit from him. He left an example of such a prophethood whose harm proved to be greater than its good. Sufferings and Conflicts increased due to his coming."

(Ittmam-al-Hujjat, Roohani Khazain vol 8, p.308)

"It is extremely shameful that Sermon of the Mount, that forms the core of the New Testament was plagiarized by (Jesus, the Messiah) from the Jewish book, The Talmud, and then he pretended as if it were his own teachings. But since the time this plagiarism has been discovered, the Christians have been suffering a great shame. Jesus committed this act (of forgery) to perhaps gain influence by presenting some good teachings....The unfortunate thing is that these teachings are an affront to the rules of wisdom and upright conscience."

(Zamima Anjam-e-Atham, Roohani Khazain vol 11 p.290)

"It is surprising that Jesus, peace be upon him, did not himself act
upon the teachings of good character." (Chashma-e-Masihi, Roohni Khazain vol 20 p.346)

"The teachings of Jesus ruined the whole of Europe due to unrestrained permission of liberty and unconditional (licentiousness). So much so that this (looseness) resulted in all (being involved ) in adultery and fornication like pigs and dogs. And (this) immorality has spread to such an extent that it is even written on the wrappers of foreign (European) sweets and candies: 'Kiss me, O my sweetheart'. Now, who is responsible for these sins? The burden of these sins is undoubtedly on Jesus."

(Nur-ul- Quran, Roohani Khazain vol 9 p.416)

"Although the Messiah (Jesus) kept healing physical ailments by this practice (of mesmerism), in terms of instilling firm belief and guidance in the hearts regarding the Oneness of God and in establishing religious steadfastness, his achivements were so poor that he was almost a failure."

(Izala-e-Auham, Roohani Khazain vol 3 p.258)

Mirza's following remark not only belittles Jesus' teachings, but it also refutes the established religious beliefs that Jesus is alive and is destined to return to earth.

"It is unjustly said about the person (Jesus) who is buried in the locality of Khanyar, Srinagar, Kashmir, that he is sitting in the Heavens. Alas! How great an injustice! God, in keeping to his promises, has the power over everything. But He can never send a person to this world the second time whose first coming caused so much harm that it ruined the world."

(Dafi-al-Bala, Roohani Khazain vol 18 p.235)

"Don't you know that Manliness and Virility are praiseworthy attributes of men. Being impotent is not a commendable quality just as being deaf and dumb are not commendable. Yes, this objection is indeed very great, that the Messiah being completely deprived of the greatest of the masculine qualities (viz. virility) could not leave a practical example of a perfect and upright social life with his wives. Therfore, the European women took advantage of the extremely shameful laxity and crossed the limits of moderation, whose consequences were the unspeakable acts, fornication and adultery."

(Nur-ul-Quran, Roohani Khazain, vol 9 pp. 392, 393)

It is worth noting that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani himself sufferred from IMPOTENCE, which he admitted in several of his writings and letters to Hakeem Nuruddin. Upon divine instructions, he prepared a special concoction of various herbs, a major component of which was OPIUM. The name of this medicine was Tiryaq-e-Ilahi (Divine Potion). Not only Mirza Ghulam but other members of his family and followers also used it.
(See Maktoobat-e-Ahmadiyya vol 5 No 2 & 4; Tiryaq-ul-Quloob, Roohani Khazain, vol 15 p.203; Statement of Mirza Mehmood son of Mirza Ghulam, AlFazl Newspaper, Qadian, vol 17 No. 6 dated 19th July 1929)

Such are examples of Mirza's heartbreaking and insulting statements, in which he shamelessly slandered, desecrated, accused and defamed Hazrat Eisa ibne Maryam (Jesus Christ), the Messiah. Because of sheer antagonism, Mirza Qadiani harboured extreme malice against Jesus. Therfore he went as far as accusing him of being an alcoholic, an impotent. Accusing Jesus of promiscuity is most absurd and sacrilegious and reminiscent of similar incidents in the past when Prophets were accused of adultery by disbelievers.

Back to Home Page